Aam Admi Party better known as AAP failed
open their account in Goa at the assembly husting. Though they provided an
option to the people, most of the electorate preferred to trust the known devil
rather than an unknown angel.
Without a shadow of doubt, Goan edition of
AAP did not have political mind-set with exception of very few like Dr. Oscar
Rebello.
Most of the candidates too, one could call
them political novices including the chief ministrial candidate Elvis Gomes.
The only one who showed some political acumen is Benaulim candidate Royla
Fernandes. That is because her father was a sarpanch for one term and
panch for three terms. she herself was a
sarpanch for two years so she grew in a political environment.
Ironically she was singled out by AAP mentor for
Benaulim, Margao, Velim and Cuncolim constituencies on local news channel. Serafino
Cota is alleged to have said that they were requests to change the candidate
for Benaulim constituency but they went ahead with Royla. That since she was a
sarpanch, people have a notion that they are close to builders.
The anchor may ask any question but there had
to tact to answer them. Instead of saying that she received very less in
Benaulim village, Cota could have pointed out that she was polled much more
than the winning candidate in Carmona which happens to Serafino home town.
Most of the candidates too, one could call
them political novices including the chief ministrial candidate Elvis Gomes.
The only one who showed some political acumen is Benaulim candidate Royla
Fernandes. That is because her father was a sarpanch for one term and
panch for three terms. she herself was a
sarpanch for two years so she grew in a political environment.
Though Royla lost to Churchill Alemao by a
margin of 5191, she managed to get more votes than the sitting MLA. While she
polled 4182 votes, Caetano Silva could manage just 3995 votes. Hence in all the
39 seats that AAP contested only she managed to defeat the sitting MLA. None of
the other candidates have achieved this feat.
Ironically she was singled out by AAP mentor for
Benaulim, Margao, Velim and Cuncolim constituencies on local news channel. Serafino
Cota is alleged to have said that they were requests to change the candidate
for Benaulim constituency but they went ahead with Royla. That since she was a
sarpanch, people have a notion that they are close to builders.
The question raised by the anchor and the
reply by AAP office bearer is taken in a different connotation, basically in a
negative sense as to why only she was targeted. And rightly so it seems that
way.
The anchor may ask any question but there had
to tact to answer them. Instead of saying that she received very less in
Benaulim village, Cota could have pointed out that she was polled much more
than the winning candidate in Carmona which happens to Serafino home town.
That apart, in my opinion individuals who ran
the campaign in Benaulim had a mind block about Royla Fernandes and secondly
were politically immature and could not make proper moves on the political chess board.
Could Serafino pin-point his efforts in Carmona village which gave lead to the
candidate.
Before making statements on media, Serafino
should first inform what initiatives did he take to douse the fire of revolt in
Benaulim regarding the selection process of AAP candidate. What measures were
taken to pacify the revolting members. Secondly he should then dig deeper and
find the truth of who encouraged AAP members to fill the candidature or
selection forms who then revolted. What measures did party office bearer take
when the revolting members started campaign against the party and then turned
their sights on the candidate. What actions did the office bearers take when
leaflets of character assassinations were being circulated.
If at all Royla has got much less votes in
her own village, so has the Cuncolim candidate and Margao candidate has not
managed to even reach 3-digit figures in any of booths in Margao.
Much hype was made about chief ministerial
candidate Elvis Gomes, what happened to him, he could attract only 3000-odd
votes and 4 in the list.
If at all Royla is being targeted because the
difference of winning margin between her and Churchill Alemao is 5191, the
difference of winning margin between Margao AAP candidate and Digambar Kamat is
more than 10,000 votes.
Serafino Cota who was appointed as the mentor
for these three constituencies was surprisingly silent on this issues. Why
couldn’t he point out their lady candidate for Benaulim was the highest vote
getter for AAP amongst all their candidates in the 2017 Assembly elections, Why
couldn’t it pointed out she was the only AAP candidate to poll more votes than
the sitting MLA.
Serious doubts about the working of AAP
functionaries have been implanted in the minds of all those voters who cast
their franchise in favour of Aam Admi Party. AAP has a selection criteria for
its candidates, the party should now seriously think of setting criteria for
spokes-persons. They should be able to articulate, get facts and figures right
before airing their comments. By making a lose comment Serafino Cota has done a
huge damage to the moral of the candidate and to the party as whole.











