Jose Maria Miranda |
It is rather disheartening that this time
too, we could be in a dilemma: Either undeserving candidates thrust on us or if
one or two happen to be different, they are unlikely to save their deposits.
Hence, a vote for these could only favour an unwanted. People of good standing
or of known integrity are generally unwilling to enter politics, solely because
these very qualities come in the way of them being elected. Often, they
themselves are apprehensive, not so much that they may not be able to resist
temptations, but that they may not be strong enough to withstand pressures and
thus refuse to sail with the tide. After all, the development of one’s
constituency depends often on one’s ability to keep one’s mouth shut or to toe
the line. And that is, unfortunately, the sole measure of the representative’s
capabilities. Fear of defeat is also a major factor deterring people from
venturing into the election arena. And this stems from the fact that good
people are generally unwanted by most, because of their unwillingness in
obliging law violators. A retired Chief Justice once remarked that corruption
starts from the bottom. I beg to differ. It is the elected representatives who
have trained their constituents to go ahead with illegalities, generally at a
price or in return for votes or other favours. Had, on the contrary, people
been warned that illegalities would be punished, we would have not reached a
stage where an Act was brought to regularize illegalities.
If our democracy worked well initially, it
was solely because our elected representatives and even our bureaucrats were of
different mettle. They were generally honest and of impeccable character, who
felt that they needed to be accountable to the people. Their conscience
demanded that they do what is right and perhaps even feared being dishonest or
unscrupulous. People, at times, would accept moral culpability for acts or
accidents which they were not directly responsible for. Lal Bahadur Shastri’s
offer of resignation, as Railway Minister, was rejected when a train accident
in Mahbubnagar killed 112 people in 1956. But, it was eventually accepted when
he again insisted on the loss of 144 lives in another mishap, a little later,
in Ariyalur in TN. Nehru, while reluctantly accepting his resignation, stated
emphatically that he was doing so solely to set an example in constitutional
propriety. Can today’s politicians, even those holding the highest positions in
the country, ever match the highly dignified behaviour of our revered ex-Prime
Minister Shastri?
In Goa, perhaps there are no regrets that
Congress was driven out but surely there are that a worse Party was brought to
power. Goans are a desperate lot today, having witnessed the betrayal of trust
and cheating both by Congress and BJP. We cannot afford it again. Having tasted
the inefficient, ineffective and corrupt rule of the first and the equally
corrupt, but surely much more destructive and highly despotic rule of the
second, we Goans ought to have come together to have a credible Goa-centric
Party. But it may remain a distant dream. While there may be dearth of
qualities and caliber of leadership in many of us, surely there isn’t of people
who love Goa immensely and are angry at the wanton destruction of our land by
greedy and unscrupulous politicians and their accomplices. But our inflated
egos, minor hurts, crab mentality, suspicious nature of distrusting or
mistrusting everyone, doubting one’s sincerity and our inability to sink petty
differences for the sake of a greater cause, have stood in the way of us coming
together for the love of Goa. Sadly, these shortcomings seem a part of our
ethos.
Though surveys and our own assessment
indicate large scale discontentment against the present dispensation, we need
to be reminded that BJP got a substantial majority in Lok Sabha, despite a vote
share of only 31%. This is sure to happen if anti-BJP forces do not unite in
Goa. It is difficult to convince political leaders to stay away, particularly
when they overestimate themselves or have other dubious reasons to contest. But
that is not the case with the group of credible citizens and spirited activists
who have come together with the sole desire of uniting for Mother Goa. They are
genuine and selfless and their love for Goa can never be in doubt. But for
these very reasons, it may be imprudent for them, at this stage, to turn into a
political force, giving margin to further vote splits and defeating the very
purpose of their unity.
Our greatest blessing in this country has
been the united efforts of Opposition parties to derail the obnoxious and
determined plans of the BJP to impose their agenda of religious and casteist
hatred among the people of India. Besides the minorities, the dalits and a good
section of students are also up in arms. The BJP will not have it easy in the
country. But when parties from various regions, with different ideologies can
unite because the need of the hour is not to allow a greater enemy to rise, why
can’t this smallest State emulate them, if our love for Goa is sincere and we
are willing to put its interests above our own? Is it too much of a sacrifice
for our land and our people?